RE:RE:RE:RocheNot sure why you consider the phase 3 Roche trial information as deceptive?
The phase 2 trail was set up with Roche as the " Gobblet" blanket of 4 cohorts.
Three of which were showed efficacy results @ very early indication.
Good news for Panc. As most don't live very long.
Moving forward to a phase 3 trial as that combo- therapy makes 100% sense.
What that relationship is called & or funding has yet to be announced.
Recall was or set up as a precision promise modified phase 3 under the control of PanCan.
With thst cancelled, the question then becomes how to fund this trial?
Will Roche be a comercial/ financial partener? Will Roch share the trial costs?
Will Roche supply product & watch from outside?
The slide deck does not answer any of those questions.
what we know for sure, the Roche cotherapy will be the basis of the phase 3.
Respectfully, anything posted on a corporate web site is vetted by lawyers.
using riches name? They would need permission from Roche. And that answe would be vetted through Roche lawyers.
corporate publications are not like this chat site. Your accusation of being deceptive is very naive to the business world as a whole.
if you look at the end of the slide deck there are 6-7 corporate logos.
They are all protected under copyright. Meaning to use them, requires corporate consent.
none of which would be given without much due diligence.
The last thing any company would want is to have their good name/ product/ etc dragged into anything close to deceptive, etc etc.
Again, please stop the silly Ad hominem attacks. Roche is well aware of what Onc has posted.
Ambiguous? Vauge ?
Without an announcement business deal, that's the best either side can say.
We can only hope Roche steps up & buys the whole thing.