RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Immediate action required for future deterrence I understand where you're coming from. Ideally I'd also like stability on all fronts including board members however if and when a board member doesn't act to the best interest of the shareholders, it's is more important to make necessary changes. Comfortabilty shouldn't trump beneficial practices.
I want to emphasize that I don't want to create more ruckus than necessary. I simply want to be assured as a shareholder in some form another (however that may be) that filings of any shares being sold or bought for that matter by insiders are reported as they should be. That there's full transparency (because a good company has nothing to hide) and proper governance.