RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:OptionsHi, 1Student: You seem to be suggesting that some larger GRA holders are holding a sizable position, and simultaneously selling shares against their position thereby somehow making money at the expense of other, smaller shareholders. Why is this any different from simply reducing some of ones holdings, then hopefully buying it back at a lower price, taking down the average cost of the position but not at the expense of other shareholders ( and incurring the risk of having to pay more for those shares sold if they miss judge the market). Do you mean that larger shareholders may try to take advantage of a longer term positive view of the GRA shares by offering to lend them out to those wanting to short the shares to create some income off their long term hold rather than see the position as dead money so to speak? Why be concerned? And why not join them if you still long term bullish on the company in as much as every share sold short will have to be covered creating extra demand when and if the general sentiment changes . Makes the rebound that much more powerful. And, about Rocco and your tirades against his options trade: I have no idea about his personal financial position, but I would assume that his options were expiring ( witness three other insiders who exercised at the same price and have not as yet sold any shares). As well, it is not evident to me that the company facilitated the placement of his optioned shares in any way, but I would not surprised as it would be in the best interests of all stakeholders for a smooth transaction. As long as the company did not expend any of its shareholder money facilitating the transaction, one shouldnt have a problem. And I see no evidence of that occurring. Thoughts?