RE:LIKE I SED NOW URE GETTING THE REST OF THE 2busy2,
Why do you insist on hiding yourself behind another kind of seemingly brain damaged writing style. Why utilize yet another alias name here at the Stockhouse LLG.V investors bulletin board?
To whom are you telling that they are now getting the rest of the story that they didn't know?
You, 2busy2, are not telling anyone anything I haven't already comprehensively pointed out here for readers.
Forget Black Swan Graphene. It too is a mere TSX-V listed shell company which is devoid of any real value.
As I said, unless and until Thomas Swan & Co and "friends" shiphon into Black Swan Graphene all those intellectual properties/trade secrets, which would actually be leverageable and therefore "bonafide" assets and which would surely cost SWAN.V "minority" equities investors all of their respective invested equity values because of massive and material dilution ensuring events, Black Swan Graphene has limited options in order to raise the required $42.8 Million needed to commence the buildout of it's merely proposed 9,878 tpa graphene manufacturing and graphene enhanced products manufacturing facilities.
To reiterate, Black Swan Graphene is essentially yet another nearest to empty and nearest to worth less TSX-V listed shell company.
Fahad El Tamimi and Thomas Swan & Co principal stakeholders just spun out a useless TSX-V listed shell company which nobody is interested in and which would have it's minority" equities owners be subjected to a share consolidation and a massive material equities issuance immediately thereafter or as part in parcel of the very same transaction; thus causing the share price to collapse down to $0.10 once again and being sold short all the way down.
That is how Black Swan Graphene officers and directors plan to keep drawing from the gullible TSX-V listed companies equities investors and keep stuffing their pockets and the pockets of their facilitating minions with the proceedes derived from such sordid machinations.
In regards to Mason Resources you stated, we own 10% of two graphite mines with offtake purchase agreements provisioned by Panasonic and now GM.
You suggested last month Mason Resources was a dead horse with nowhere near enough cash to pursue any sort of strategic business development investment plan, which actually never existed to begin with.
Mason Resources did not, as you foolishly suggest, receive that 9% tranche of Nouveau Monde Graphite equities for free.
Said tranche of NOU.V equities ownership did cost LLG.V "minority" equities investors the 100% ownership of Lac Gueret.
It's likely that any actual or implied value assigned to that 9% tranche of NOU.V equities will not be allowed to accurately be reflected in and by the Mason Resources share price. I purely gambled that it would be reflected in and by the LLG.V share price and I clearly expected the LLG.V share price would be taken upward to at least $0.33 during the very day of the sale of Lac Gueret having been announced.
The share price had since been quite intentionally collapsed down to $0.125 from an intraday high of $0.24 achieved during January 22.
That's a nearer to 50% collapse in the LLG.V share price since the very day the sale of Lac Gueret was announced.