RE:Student...please educate us all Gorilladome47,
You stated "Student, FYI I'm dropping the "1"... it just doesn't work for me...feel free to do the same re the 47, I think we can at least be on a first name basis going forward..."
I am just one student in a world full of students. I am one student always studying; hence I am 1student.
Also, I don't mind that older than bissett Creek dirt comment you previously suggested about me. I actually get a laugh out of it. Thanks.
That being said, let's get back to brass tacks.
In asisting you with your questions #1 and #2, I'll sate the following.
Heraeus Group's "PorocarbTM High-performance porous hard carbon anode and cathode battery component materials additive coating, is exactly that, a additive coating which is indispensible to each step process in the manufacturing of both active anode and active cathode battery materials components; as such, it is in fact also battery anode material or "BAM".
Let me put it this way for you or other readers.
If you don't chose to introduce a sufficiently robust, pure enough proprietarily porous and highlly conductive carbon coating to all spheronized, purified graphite anode materials, you may as well fill a large enough box with such uncoated anode component material and utilize that full box as something to prop open a door with.
After all, you certainly shouldn't utilize what would be such inferior uncoated and therefore not utilizable anode material as comprising just one of the integral components within a battery cell.
The exact same comments apply to the indispensible proprietary coating of cathode battery compenent material.
What's more, the fact that the Heraeus Group "PorocarbTM component materials additive coating could likely be what's called "a drop in" coating additive solution for battery anode and cathode manufacturers and battery cells manufacturers is especially a quite lucrative proposition.
To your points regarding the function provisioned for the battery anode and cathode components by the "PorocarbTM High-performance porous hard carbon anode and cathode battery component materials additive coating, I will say that you touched on one of the requisite performance functions which the "PorocarbTM additive coating material was proprietarily designed to most specifically address.
Amongst other to be sufficiently mitigated factors at play within a battery cell, the routine generation within a battery cell of structurally destructive degrees of heat and also the progressively damaging interfacial chemical reactivity which occurs when anode and cathode are being surrounded by electrolyte and subjected to charging and dischaging cycles requires that both the anode and cathode comprising a battery cell are robustly guarded from such pejoratively destructive degradation, in various forms, of the anode and cathode component materials.
We note that it is this degradation of battery cells components, in whatever form you would like to cite, that ultimately leads to battery cell components failure and battery cells failure, leading perhaps to fires.
It would therefore go without saying that sufficiently preventing premature battery cells components degradation, in whatever form and extent, prolongs the engineered and therefore epected cycle life and overall performance efficiency of the battery material components (anodes and cathodes) and therefore the overall performance and the cycle life of the battery cell.
What's more, the proprietarily designed porosity and the hard carbon architectural matrix structure comprising the "PorocarbTM" additive coating product is:
- highly conducive to promoting immensely less resistivity and therefore most efficient ion transfer
- immensely effective at the efficient containment of what is a expected 4x silicon anode material expansion and is, amongst other highly beneficial and High-performance ensuring battery components cell performance, clearly promoting of overall ionic and stored electric energy conductivity.
Heraeus Group's proprietary technologies and capabilities, as comprehensively licensed to Northern graphite Corporation, are all that and a bag of chips; the "PorocarbTM" additive coating product is the cat's meow Gorilladome47. I certainly know enough to tell you that you can believe that.
The reason why Hereus Group representatives and stakeholders didn't just go it alone and leverage this wonderful tech for big bucks, partnering with a billion dollar blue chip company that is one of the big boyz at the OEM big boy table, is a wee bit involved, so to speak?
I have spoken precisely to why it was decided by Heraeus Group prinipals that strategically Northern Graphite Corporation was representative of a strategically more perfect solution allowing for the exportation to North America of specifically German (the European and clearly EU leader) industrial corporation intellectual properties, technological capabilities, knowhow, experience, etc.
There is absolutely no use to putting together this kind of deal if there wasn't massive baotloads of gravy to be had by all highly interested parties concerned.
Jesus, Joseph and Mary Gorilladome47!
A retired U.S. Military Major General and a clearly politically connected individual such as "The Honorable Albert C. Zapanta just doesn't one day decide to waltz over to the CEO of a (what did you call it?) "nothing penny stock/market cap junior mining company that can't even deliver the Sunday news paper let a lone anything on a macro mass commercial industrial scale"
You said "The fact they would go with NGC makes no sense if that had other bigger and better options? "
My dear sir. It doesn't have to ever make sense to you; it needs to make lots of Dollars worth of the kind, quality and quantum of sense or Dollars worth of cents for certain privately operating, privately designated, privately positioned and always privately "controlling" NGC.V equities investors.
Perhaps you believe it was an accidental mentioning on my part when I elected to most specifically bring forth the very example of Timminco Ltd.
Did you even bother to research said company and bother to draw the distinct parallels amongst both Timminco Ltd and Northern Graphite Corporation? Ding, Ding Ding! Did that ring your Gorilladome bell?
Do you get it now Gorilladome47?
Admittedly though, this time around it's "the real deal" because Germany's Heraeus Group "PorocarbTM" High-performance porous hard carbon anode and cathodes coating additive material is in fact "THE REAL DEAL" and Northern Graphite Corporation has existing REAL GRAPHITE BEARING LANDS and REAL Lac des illes expanded graphite reserves and expandable graphite processing capabilities type ASSETS which have been made available for the intentions of certain privately operating, privately designated, privately positioned and always privately "controlling" NGC.V equities investors.
When I quite intentionally called Hugues Jacquemin, Guillaume Jacq, Greggory Bowes et al "Missionaries On Assignment", I know precisely why I chose that uniquely fasioned term; and they certainly know precisely why as well.
You'll note I first utilized that uniquely fashioned term more than 20 years ago, when addressing another crew of dispatched "Missionaries on Assignment". I am the originator of that specifically employed term.
I have always been able to clearly identify whom the lieges having dispatched such "Missionaries On Assignment" are and I have always been able to identify precisely what motivations and specific intents always suppport the lieges assigning the roles, responsibilities and dictating the objectives to such clearly dispatched "Missionaries On Assignment".
You. Gorilladome47, suggested "We need execution, singles and doubles will work, we dont need home runs to move the needle quite yet. Get it done Hugues."
Indeed we do.
I am getting quite bored with the pace of such singles and doubles necessarily being hit and I am simply considering folding up my chair and leaving this particular baseball game, so to speak.
As I said, I'll simply walk away and no longer say another word here until ..., thereby allowing natural gravity take over here with the NGC.V share price and consequentially having the share price experience a 50% drop from the current book value per share price of $0.19. That is $0.09.
My current clear generosity has limits; and I have just about exhausted such self-imposed limit Gorilladome47.
It's time for this Pav Jordan guy to do his f_ _ _ i_ g job. It's time for those investors relations firm minions hired by NGC to do their f_ _ _ i_ g job as well.