RE:Let's be more balanced and positive"Trading multipoles are a whole differnt ball game on that exchnage......"
And AEZS trades at a discount to its cash for a reason (how about almost 99% shareholder value destruction over the past 20 years, and 4 rollbacks in the last 10 or less years).
Gilles has not partnered with anyone for the last 10 years to advance PGX, nor brought any new products to the market. Plenty of stocks have done well on the TSXV. If CZO was signing agreements with the Pepsi's, Danone's of the world (that's Gilles name dropping) to advance PGX, I'm sure investors and fund managers would be clamouring to buy the shares regardless of the exchange it is trading at. Pender Fund growth buys shares that trade on the TSXV. Heck, based on BNN analysts in 2016, it had a nice rise on speculation and investors were buying in the hopes that expansion of PGX capacity by 10X would mean much higher revenues.
If you've followed the company over the past say 7 years, you will know what failure is. If you believe a CEO who works remotely, part-time, 1,000s of KM away as a consultant - CEO has been effective and should continue on then go ahead and pick up all these shares at a 52 week low.