Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Alternate Symbol(s):  HPQFF

HPQ Silicon Inc. (HPQ) is a Canada-based technology company specializing in green engineering of silica and silicon-based materials. The Company is engaged in developing, with the support of technology partners PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (PyroGenesis) and Novacium SAS, new green processes to make the critical materials needed to reach net zero emissions. Its activities are centered around the three pillars: becoming a green low-cost (Capex and Opex) manufacturer of Fumed Silica using the Fumed Silica Reactor, a proprietary technology owned by HPQ being developed for HPQ by PyroGenesis; becoming a producer of silicon-based anode materials for battery applications with the assistance of Novacium SAS, and Novacium SAS is engaged in developing a low carbon, chemical base on demand and high-pressure autonomous hydrogen production system. The Company operates in a single operating segment, segment, being the sector of the transformation of quartz into silicon materials and derivative products.


TSXV:HPQ - Post by User

Comment by Mostlyseriouson Feb 27, 2024 4:06pm
102 Views
Post# 35902327

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:hpq

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:hpqI am really trying hard, with my limited comprehension of the english language.

This is what the previous poster said:  "....if its a gold mine someone by now would either be buying them out or start having contrats signed for future porduction." 

I interpreted this as an idea of acquiring the company or the technology OR signing material supply "contrats".  "Contracts" en francais, or just a typo in the english term.


And this is what you said:  "I think the July timeframe being suggested is a fair one since by then the Fumed Silica pilot plant should be ready. I'm hoping that the major players won't wait until them and that one of them will want to commit and lock in a deal.....the cost savings, efficiencies and environmental benefits are just to great to ignore."

The post that you dismissed as being naive suggested that something should have happened by now, while you are saying too early, 4 months more realistic...even thought it is still before the pilot plant is running.  And it is very true that you said nothing about "contracts".  That is my bad because you referred to a "deal". If I may also strengthen your argument, it is very true that you said that "big conglomerates" don't work that way, and your vision refers to "major players". 

I now fully understand how I was completely out to lunch for suggesting that the two ideas were substantively comparable.  And I can see how there can be no basis whatsoever to the hypotethesis that you view your opinion as more thoughtful than that of others, especially of those that do not like HPQ as an investment as much as you do, and may present arguments that things have not unwound just like always expected.  

Using a larger font or typing slower may help but I would not like to inconvenience you because of my lack of comprehension.  Appreciate the consideration though.  Cheers.


KrapShoet wrote:

Mostlyserious wrote:

"You're very naive.  Big conglomerates don't work in that fashion."

I wonder who said that in response to someone's thought that if things were so great someone would swoon in?


Dude you really need to read more carefully. Hey would it help if I typed slower or used a larger font?

The previous poster suggested contracts. Now in my comment do I mention contracts? Contracts on products that are not ready with commercial quantities and before the pilot? I don't think so. That would be naive thus my reference to a JV or offtake hopefully before the pilot completion. 

Let me know when you've transitioned from mostly serious to a serious investor and then maybe I'll take you seriously. 



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>