RE:RE:RE:RE:Optimistic outlook There are several ways to value a gold project. The "AISC method" is definitely insufficient - it gives a clue.
On the one hand, the legal representatives argued with the NAV method (Net Asset Value). Because there are many costs, for example G&A, which were not reflected in the AISC costs.
However, the $100 per ounce reserves is a good approach. It roughly corresponds to the price paid for a takeover. At >10 moz AuEq (Au and AG) this corresponds to 1 billion USD. In addition, there are investments made of around USD 760 million. And now the interest (and especially) the compound interest since 2011. That's an amount of over 3 billion USD. The NAV valuation was also over $3 billion. I assume compensation of at least $3 billion.