RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Baxter ramping up hiring for VantiveGood conversation MM and G-unit, so in the interest of not causing any confusion I'm going to do the old fashioned, laborious cut/paste, quotation marks format, etc. Ughhh.
"However, as others and I have said, they may want to create some more excitement around their IPO and nothing creates excitement more than promoting new streams of ( high margin) revenue. Especially ones that could exceed $1-$2B annually in time." MM
An IPO is technically a launch, and the only question in my mind is if Baxter wants to launch her little old toy rocket by itself, or does she want to strap on some high octane booster rockets called PMX/EAA?
Baxter knows that all of Vantive's products are just legacy devices and machine/dinosaur's with a flat growth rate in a market that is growing. If you're flat, in a market that is growing, that means you are shrinking, and that's a fact. Take away PMX/EAA from that Vantive future slide, and it's beyond dismal. Oh and PMX/EAA comes with booster rockets too from a PR front,
"Baxter's PMX/EAA makes first major advancement in the treating of Sepsis since Alexander Fleming first discovered Penicillin." NYT
chuckle.
Clearly I say this in jest, but PMX turns a stodgy old Non-innovator Dinosaur, into this like hip stylish walking around town kind of dinosaur. Instant make over and growth potential all achieved with just one stone.