RE:LDI...only explored 3 out of 14 targets, 8 yrs LOMOgopogo007,
Once drill core assays derived data set had been publicly disseminated and especially following the recent preliminary mineral resource estimate press release, I don't know of anybody who suggested that that last year's drilling campaign was not successful. Such a fact certainly puts your alleged FUD drivel permanently to bed Ogopogo007.
If you are going to come at me, come at me with facts and come hard Ogopogo007.
You should by now know better than to pull that FUD excrement with me Ogopogo007.
Hugues Jacquemin stated that the newly reported preliminary mineral resource estimate is not yet proven and to prove up an actual graphite reserve would take comparatively a heck of a lot more drilling and derived data analysis and "a proven conclusion", which would take us well into 2025 before NGC representatives would know what they are going to do at Lac des Illes.
We note that when Hugues Jacquemin went about stating Lac des Illes newly estimated graphite reserve could be proven up and mining commenced before the end of this year and then went about stating that it wouldn't be until this company's representatives prove up this merely preliminary ressource estimate, which would take well into 2025 before NGC representatives would know what they are going to do at Lac des Illes, . . . Suffice to say that given these two different suggestions issued by Hugues Jacquimin, it's clear that Hugues Jacquemin entirely contradicted himself.
What's more, Hugues Jacquemin spoke about "our partner" for Baie Comeau; and yet, no partner has been announced, i.e. unless he is in fact still alluding to Graphex Technologies LLC being the battery anode material partner for Baie Comeau?
Alas, We are left with more questions, no answers provided and contradictions attributable to Hugues Jacquemin to boot. That is quite typical of the modus operandi of Hugues Jacquemin et al.
We know that Baie Comeau isn't likely to become a relatity until 2028 to 2030, i.e. if ever.
As youknowwhat succinctly pointed out, there was a previously proposed rail line coming into Baie Comeau that is now apparently dead stopped and there doesn't exist enough Hydro generated electricity supply for the merely proposed "supersite" Baie Comeau BAM process manufacturing pipedream project.
Less yammering from Hugues Jacquemin et al and many more tangible deliverables need to be successfully locked down, with all the necessary details accompanying the news of such necesarily achieved tangible deliverables.
Who the flock of seagulls are they now trying to kid with this Solid State Battery component materials (both anode and cathode) porous hard carbon additive coating angle for this 10 year old developed and not one offtake customer secured "PorocarbTM"?
Where is the solid state battery components additive coating incorporating offtake agreement issuing battery cells manufacturer that should have already been secured after a ten year "PorocarbTM" "development" period undertake on behalf of Heraeus Group by said company's battery R&D division representatives?
Alas, absolutely nowhere to be found; and the reason for that is that SSB chemistries won't likely be commonly employed within the global battery cells manufacturing industry for another ten years or more. Such chemistries are just to costly to employ and the overwhelming majority of such developed SSB chemistries components comprised battery cells just haven't been validated, qualified and ultimately certified for use by or on behalf of battery materials manufacturers, battery cells manufacturers and their respective automotive manufacturer partners.
Readers should note that with the proprietary "SiGTM" graphene-silicon anode component additive material being employed today by a certain Montreal based company within proprietary graphene enhanced battery cells, it's clear that any battery cells manufacturer can attain solid state level volumetric engergy density performance attributes (that's an industry leading 1,150 Wh/L) along with stellar industry leading other performance attributes should they wish.
That's correct. The Quebec based company I allude to has proprietary chemistries agnostic and battery cells form factor agnostic graphene-silicon enhanced battery anode materials, graphene enhanced electrolyte and graphene enhanced cathode active material which hands down outperforms, in every way, this "PorocarbTM" candidate product material.
Clearly nobody is waiting around for this "PorocarbTM" anode or cathode additive coating material candidate product to become fully developed in another 10 years or so Ogopogo007.
Until expressly and adequately proven otherwise, the licencing of this "PorocarbTM" High-performance porous hard carbon anode/cathode additive coating candidate product is considered by me to be "a white elephant" type of purchase or what some could choose to call "a fugazi ".
Try again Hugues Jacquemin.
Alas, it would certainly seem as though everybody and their cousins have caught on to what is in my opinion seeming more and more like a NGC grift.
Pack it up Hugues Jacquemin, Greggory Bowes, Guillaume Jacq, et al.