RE:RE:RE:Nervous NelliesThe changes to the FS 100% revolves around a decision to have a bigger yearly output & shorten up the mine life a bit. It's a decision based on the trade off studies. Was it all Troilus wanting this change? Is it our future JV partner (99.9% we are not going at this alone) asking for more output? No one knows. I do know that internally the numbers seen (yes the study has been completed) are very much liked & there is a lot of confidence behind them. The FS is not some 2 page HS book report. When a major change like this comes in the 11th hour it is quite an undertaking to make the adjustments. They have one chance to get this right & optimize the economics of the project. I believe they will do just that. There is no question that the communication from the company has been poor. But honestly, it's always been a weak point....maybe by design. I'm more interested in the final results. To date since 2017 Troilus have systematically moved towards developing this property at a very good clip. I'm expecting the DFS out by 5/1 at the latest. However, if it took a bit longer so be it. All I care is they get it right. As far at the project being delayed...permitting is moving along, financing talks are on going & the estimated break ground sate has stayed the some. So I see no delay. In some of the pieces, but the puzzle as a whole remains on track. Of course the construction start date provided is if everything hits the mark. I'm sure there will be at least some frustration with that as well.