RE:RE:Summary of Lawsuit C 11777-2020It is not illegal for an entity to own more than one concession on the same land. This is proved by the lawsuits, C 719-2011 filed by Cristobal Lopehandia, and C 560-2012, filed by JL. Both of these suits tried to nullify Los Amarillos 1-3000 concessions because they were overstaked by the Tesoros and CMN had not objected to the overlap. The verdict to C 719-2011 stated in #24: "it can be seen that the Mr. Unda Llanos – formal owner of the belongings "Tesoro 1 1/30" to “Tesoro 12 1/5" - said each one of them acting on a petition from the Mining Company Nevada S.A. , who at the time would have been his employer, and in whose name would be transferred such belongings when these were constituted, what follows then concludes that the Mr Unda Llanos acted as a true representative of defendant company for such purposes."
The action for the nullity of Los Amarillos 1-3000 concessions was rejected, and both the Los Amarillos 1-3000 and the Tesoro concessions validly exist to this day.
On the other hand, two different entities/persons can not own a concession over the same area. This is the reason that neither Villar's nor JL's claims could ever be constituted as concessions.