RE:RE:How deep is the relationship between LABS & traditional QContinuum1 wrote: Nothing you stated in your post is mathematics, let be clear.
The first part of your post where the CEO stated debt free and owning assets, that is fact.
Everything else after that is just blather and opinion. Until there is a time where LABS issues a NR stating that they have 20 trials and show that 'many' are in PHIII with a completion date within a year, then it doesn't matter how many times you post that trials nonsense, it's just not fact.
But if you and the missus like to talk about Pfizer and JJ or whatever between meals or squeezing off some shots, by all means. Just don't state that drivel as fact or some kind of profound DD, lol.
ya i agree
he sometimes he does post useful stuff but when he gets into the whole universe his alien GF Mumbo Jumbo i start to scrach my head and think whats this guy on ?!
he put me on Ignore because i asked a few too many questions for his likeing
In the end all that matters is even if we look at LABS prospects conservativly we are looking pretty stellar
there is absolutely no need to embelish in any way the actual facts speak for themselves