RE:RE:RE:Now they are paying $117 million for 14% or 800 mill Yo Slewy, our man, once again you are correct with many thoughts / issues related to all things Taseko but you too tend to over exaggerate on the negatives. First Ole Slew, you're not being completely forthcoming with your statement about share values "for the past 15 years" unless “you do a bit of swing trading". Sorry Slewmeister, that's a very misleading statement. Why? You're missing huge swaths of investors like us ole Slew! We started buying at the $1 US region before the Covid crash and loaded up the truck from .30 cents U.S. back to the .80 cent region. Then we started swing trading after it went back over $1 through its recent highs of around $2.75 US and back down again through the next rollercoaster ride. All of this has occurred in the last six years alone. So Slew, Taseko has been anything but a "bust" for lots of people here that entered their positions within this very large time period. C'mon Slew, you're better than overplaying a statement like that. Next, you keep talking about the "hedged 40% of 2024 at $3.25" Unless we're missing something in your context, that is a misleading statement as well. Why? Spending on put contracts to protect the $3.25 isn't capping their proceeds from production at $3.25 at all. You know that. What they have done in the past is structure the trade so that their production is capped at the $5.25 US level (historically speaking) but that's it. To be fair, not sure exactly how this trade specifically is structured but it's highly doubtful it's very different from past transactions. Spending $2M or such for protective puts might not be your preference but that is how they've rolled for several years now. All that said, your hedging comments are misleading. As to the rest of your comments, mostly agree. As we've previously said, we'll most likely be exiting after Q1, depending on overall market indicators and raising cash for after the market crash. Tell the whole truth Slew, not most of it. You're better than that.