RE:RE:RE:The Take-OverHi Ingiboy:-
Even if we all owned the same number of shares as before, in order to receive 92% of the revenue, Andrew Schutte would have to have some type of 'special' shares himself!
Yes they did introduce a 'poison pill' some years ago. Talk about optimism!
If Andrew Schutte thinks he can pull this robbery off, what is the incentive for him to try to find a solution to the issues Replicel is facing before the vote? We do not even know if he has spoken with 'interested potential partners!'
Turning the tables, does anyone really believe that Andrew Schutte would accept an 'offer to purchase' like this from any other Replicel shareholder?
It amazes me that we went from a professional presentation on the Company moving forward at the September AGM to complete silence for 6 months (with the exception of the arbitration decision news release) to this! Was this the CEO's plan B all of the time?