Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia, which is host to the Goldstorm Deposit, a large gold-copper porphyry system, as well as several other mineralized zones. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,913 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Comment by Jetstream1281on Mar 26, 2024 7:34pm
134 Views
Post# 35954268

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: hit piece on treaty creek by crux investors

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: hit piece on treaty creek by crux investors More innacuracies and opposing information...

As per Crux...


Another area of concern within the MRE is the methodology and inputs used to calculate cut-off grades. For example, the external consultants JDS use an “internal mill’ cut-off grade excluding mining cost to drop the open pit cut-off grade. This is conceptually invalid as the mining cost will have to be incurred to make the material available for treatment.


They then say in the NEXT SENTENCE....

Furthermore, JDS uses open-pit and underground mining costs and processing costs that are unrealistic in the current operating environment.

Ok, so are they or are they not including mining consts????? Where's the data that shows that the numbers TUD is or isn't using are too low? TUD clearly states in their MRE right below the tables what mining costs were used.....Not sure why this should be such a confusing thing.....

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>