RE:NO PROBLEM. So Insiders added at $5. Sounds good. JuIieRichards wrote:
WSJ Consesus data: EPS, FY2024 $1.03, FY2025 $1.09, FY2026 .92
https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/CA/XTSE/DRX/research-ratings
Please post source for $2 EPS
INvestors pay for tangible and verified GROWTH prospects. Not for claims.
Insiders added at $5 range.. let's verfy that too. Not a big deal. Accepted
Let's see institutional open up their purses at $8. I call BS. Not a chance. It has served the Ponzi scheme creators. Don't think the family is alll that please either. Touts work the stocks that don't have much coverage to dupe retail. Oh yeah, why were they posting on Suncor board? Seriously? that's touting
Can't you read. You don't understand my point. I said about $2, I was not sure. Someone else replied it was $1.3 depending of sources.
And even if it is $1 as you say and you say the stock is going to $3 or $5, do you realize it does not make sense? That's my point a PE of 3 for DRX does not make sense...
A PE ratio of 3 or 5... Yeah right...
I wouldn't agree with a PE of 8 or $8 in the long term, but if you said the stock was going to $8, it would have made more sense, but $3...
What worries me is that like you, I invested recently in Air Canada. I worry if I made a good decision because I just don't understand your logic with DRX... You behave like a troll.