RE:RE:RE:Insider trading. Do yourself a favour and look up 'materiality'. And once you've done that, remind yourself that just because you 'think' something has happened, doesn't mean it actually has and certainly not in the way you believe.
As an example (again), simply because they may have an agreement with some entity in Brazil, that agreement itself may not be material given there may not be any hard values associated with it. Simply inking an agreement that states that someday we might sell something may not meet the materiality requirements.
You're all wound up because you have convinced yourself that LABS has done this or that when in fact they haven't done anything of the sort, for had they, they would have announced it.