Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp NCPCF


Primary Symbol: T.NCP

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development company. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration and evaluation of nickel and platinum group metals (PGM) mineral properties in North America. Its flagship asset is its 100%-owned nickel-copper PGM project, located in the Yukon Territory, Canada (Nickel Shaw Project). The project is in the southwest of Canada's Yukon Territory, approximately 317 kilometers (km) northwest (NW) of the capital, Whitehorse. The Nickel Shaw Project is a large undeveloped nickel sulphide project, with a unique mix of metals including copper, cobalt and platinum group metals. The Nickel Shaw Project has access to infrastructure, located three hours west of Whitehorse via the paved Alaska Highway, which further offers year-round access to deep-sea shipping ports in southern Alaska. The Company also maintains environmental baseline activities, considers optimization alternatives and seeks other opportunities.


TSX:NCP - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Apr 04, 2024 1:31pm
133 Views
Post# 35970804

2BUSY2 -----> read or think

2BUSY2 -----> read or think If it were not for....
finding the Prophecy Coal's website validated 
how good the ( historical bore holes ) were.

Matching 2011 - 2015 press drill results ( depth and grade ) with pea reports
helped gain a better understanding of....
= what the main Prophecy focus was ( initially ) 2011 - early 2015
= UG Mine + Benieth Mine + 1km strike + Exotics ( later 2.5 km strike )

What's so odd ?
Prophecy Coal's + Prophecy Platinum's websites
are very..... very hard to find online.
Why is that 2busy2 ?
lol

What i do know ?
2015's pea focused on 
UG mine + below mine + 2.5 km strike + exotics
Sulphides + Gabbs + Peridotite ( were apart of resource )

2017
test gabbs and sulphides at later date


2023
if 2017 said test sulphides and gabbs at later date,
1 - core under mine + benieth mine may have been segragated
2 - lower ultramafics not tested


2015 pea + 2023 pfs pit shells are rather shallow
appears each may not include the deeper ( 300 - 676m drill depths )
= lower ultramafics

When 2016/2017 crew performed more drilling for new MET tests,
upper and lower holes were practiced.
= Press did not state if upper or lower hole was sent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

If 2017 Crew said test sulphides and gabbs later,
then the obvious question is...

Have the sulphides and gabbs ( highest grade ore )
been separated from the resource ?



Suppose they were separated,
not apart of 2023 pfs.


Would this not shed light on, poor recoveries ?
lol    ( 2023 payables ).


2015 crew included sulphides and gabbs with 80% peridotite blend.
= good recoveries

IF.... 2016/2017 crew performed more MET tests,
suppose there were no sulphides and gabbs ?
= would result in poor recoveries

WHY ?
Extraction company could not handle silicates. ( 2017 press )

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suppose UG mine + Benieth mine and West zone
were segragated from 2023 resource size - what might support this ?

1 - 2023 pit shell skirts UG mine and rides overtop
2 - No exotics in 2023 PFS  ( UG mine has most % of exotics )
3 - 86% resource axed in 2017 ( majority benieth UG mine )

4 - Image back up support
     these two images speak volumes
     Johnson hole outside pea pitshell
     Johnson + Several orher holes ( 500m - 756m ) depths vs 2023 pitshell
     2015 pitshell with drill holes beyond pea pit shell


Why is it ( 2busy2 ) avoid these incredible talking points ?
Are you trying to say Lee crew were embellishers ?
Or.... is it more like the two images below tell the eeal story
Lots of ore below the shallow 1 st phase pit shells and
86% lower ultramafics were not included in, pea's / pfs's ?
Even exotics and other minerals.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53521505591_6e24ef0d7b_c.jpg



https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53520608537_e27368a5f4_c.jpg



With all due respect ( 2busy2 ) Kind of hard to dismiss the
historical drills - reassaying - exotics - 846 million t inferred


846 million t inferred
tied to 2017 press ( test sulphides and gabbs later )
= points to lower ultramafics + UG mine


Try to be kind - 2busy2






<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>