RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NanoXplore could face rough times ahead?lire01,
You stated "Seems to me some fairly concentrated buying just below the 2.6 level , price being held in check by quite large offerings coming and going to perhaps discourage smaller shareholders who apparently make up a very large portion of the shares."
What you are suggesting is that the NanoXplore share price is being subjected to straight out relatively low daily traded shares volume enabled MANIPULATION.
There really is no other way to say it lire1.
Those aren't really smaller shareholders personally selling. It's the accounts of such retail and institutional investors clients which are being fully serviced by certain investments managers and are being utilized to dump NanoXplore shares to market in order to keep the GRA.T share price below CAD$3.00.
Round trip trading amongst concertedly acting individuals employed to go about utilizing algorithmic trading software enabled platforms in order to knock the NanoXplore share price down whenever it catches some wind taking it upward.
It's MANIPULATION lire1 .
The fact being that NanoXplore isn't being allowed to rid itself of the seemingly inextricably attached and God forsaken CAD$2.00 share price handle simply disgusts me.
You stated "Insider purchases seem to have ceased at end of March. Blackout period?
Hmm? Perhaps you would do well to ask Messrs. Rocco Marinaccio, Pierre-Yves Terrisse and their friends and business partners over at Echelon Wealth Partners about some "blackout period".
Perhaps you can ask Karanjit Bhugra and Asad Said, the co-heads of Capital Markets at Echelon Wealth Partners.
You said "Ain't capitalism great?"
Somehow I am wondering whether you are likely trying to suggest ain't that NanoXplore share price MANIPULATION great lire1?