RE:" I'm happy to be wrong." - ShiftyWell, there is no offense to be wrong... but the way you state your "opinions" as if they were being facts, using bad maths to prove your points, not backing up anything with references: that what is bad.
Your goal is to put doubts in newcomers that could be interrested to invest in SGNL. It always was.
From someone that told me he got a high IQ in some private message (really, perhaps people here would be interrested to see a couple of them), you should be more on the right side that the wrong in my opinion, no?
--------------------------
DDD... you are wrong again about my intentions.
My intentions were always to help people to make money or at least to not lose money.. I'd suggest that in the past year, my opinions were much more on the right side than the wrong side. And your opinion on buying has been totally wrong for 20 ish years. Isn't that everyone's goal here....to make money and not lose money. And to help others to do the same?
I do have a high IQ. I'm smart. Perhaps I don't have the best people skills.
As for being right more than I am wrong. Perhaps you could make a flowchart of when I gave my opinion on if I was will to buy at that time, and compare it to when you stated that you were buying. Your chart will be much bigger than mine.
I think you will find that I was almost always right (high iq), and you were always wrong.
As for the pm's....I just read through them. I will gladly post every single one of them here if you feel that is a threat to me. Like Eminem in 8 mile when he one the rapoff.. if you want to threaten again to post them, next time I will just post every single one .
Remember the one where I said I hope they have some good results. and you replied that results only need to be strongly "suggesting" a third pit.
-------
Yeah... results only need to be strongly "suggesting" a third pit IMO, not necessarily needing to shoot at the stars. (this was the response by DDD in a PM)
// I hope they have some good results.. (This was by me in the PM)