RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Should have sold this garbage for the tax lossHarley103,
You stated "1student your negative views on why Haraeus Group joined NGC are nothing but speculation".
Speculation you say?
It's a simple question really. Was Heraeus Group actually paid for the assets which were sold to NGC or did NGC promise to pay Heraeus Group going forward?
Hmm? You doubt Heraeus Group would be a NGC "creditor" until Heraeus Group is paid in full?
By the way, Heraeus Group didn't join NGC. Heraeus Group was allowed by "The Missionaries On Assignment" and their lieges to milk NGC, doing so by way of selling worth less so called assets to NGC.
Heraeus Group representatives did not bring at least one single offtake agreement to the NGC because of the fact being that after 10 years of so called "PorocarbTM" development, those now NGC Battery Materials Group employees couldn't validate nor did they have qualified and necessarily have that "PorocarbTM" candidate product certified for use by any collaborating battery materials manufacturer and/or battery cells manufacturer.
I'll admit that I too thought this time it could be different; and yet, that thought simply didn't last long when I necessarily reminded myself what the modus operandi attributable to Hugues Jacquemin, Greggory Bowes et al most certainly is.
The end game, as you suggest, would be that the remaining so called assets are shifted, shuffled and privately dealt away by and on behalf of "The Missionaries On Assignment" and as only having benefited"The Missionaries On Assignment" and their lieges.
Finally, it doesn't matter who the CEO is or whom the other "Missionaries On Assignment are or would be.
What always matters most is whom the company "creditors are deemed to be, e.g. "Sprott", Imerys SA,, Heraeus Group and that Greggory Bowes "consulted" company, The company creditors always call the shots and "the end game".