FEW COMPARISONS 2011 - mid 2015 - ug mine main focal monies
- fixing up iside the ug mine mine monies
- drilling new holes monies
- relogging monies
- tech report monies
- pea report monies
- promotion monies
- premium 2013 assays ( restoring hidtorical holes ) monies **
- exotic reveal monies
- shares to staff - dilution monies
- stepout holes from ug mine focal monies
'
= 2015 accumilative work revamped historical high grade ug mine and stepout tonnage - keep mine intact - open pit + mine portions of ug mine
- shallow pits vs johnson holes and inside bore holes run much deeper
- 2015 factored - 846 mil tonnes inferred
= keep mine intact while model with open pit ( stinky ) In this small ( inset image ) we can see the ug mine portal ( outside ) pea boundary.
open in new window zoom in
keep in mind - ug mine strkes N/W path (
important note: for later in post )
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335327436_d7de7b5e7e_c.jpg Now, with the image of portal entry in mind - transfer to this image
Allows better birdseye view of ug mine strke path
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53320845588_6e26abc7b6_c.jpg Late 2015 forward everything changed. Shareholders are well versed by now of how many.
This next image will act the "
control " for elevation
only clear image that references the elevation if expanded.
2015 forward most all images were blurred
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53649429855_5b1decced2_z.jpg Let's now pull forward m " triage comparison " 1st image we can see - pea pit did include the ug mine
- but not the deep zones ( just kept a shallow pit )
- we know the mine portal is moreso backside of first hump mountain
Last image ( 3rd ) ( 2023 pit ) - they did run the pit deeper ( gained more tonnage
What changed ? - sulphies a gabbs ( 2017 test later ) is absent from 3rd image
- replaced by peridotite
even massive clino high grade orange zones - replaced by waste ores ( green and grey )
the deep mass high grade runs clear under second mountain
all those high grades are now - green and grey zones
= 2023 pfs has significant waste ores
- waste ores that should be high grade ores
- waste costs are near same as mine cost
which begs ? are 2023 waste ore tonnage costs tied to -
high grade ores but not recognized ? mine the high grade but label it waste ?
3rd image speaks volumes when paired with 2017 test sulphides gabbs later
even massive orange clino got converted to peridotite - course grind extraction ( hmm )
Another anomaly ?
2023 pitshell images showing 10m benches = portray shallow pit depths
versus
2023 pfs - 3rd image above portrays upto 500m pit depths with peridotite conversion.
Has wellgreen been thrown a peridotite bone with not the best extraction
and ug mine and high grade ores converted to waste and added costs of
wastes tacked on, 2023 pfs affecting value of wellgreen ?
What was the 2015 resource built upon ?
UG mine and stepouts with deep inferred tonnage - 846 million tonnes more.