RE:Keystone Financial Podcast about GRADaudau11,
Thanks for the link to the podcast also featuring commentary about NanoXplore.
I guess if you want to gauge how effective those commentators are in simply repeating what is already know, you can tune in.
I notice there wasn't much mention of the for now 100% equity owned VoltaXplore enterprise nor the suggested possibility, as clearly suggested by NanoXplore representatives during the prior quarterly conference call, of anywhere from 45% to 55% or perhaps all of VoltaXplore's equity being exchanged with a primary partner/customer/capital financier.
More specifically, there was no mention of how such an exchange of part of or all of VoltaXplore equity ownership for requisite capital would quite positively impact the NanoXplore balance sheet in an immediate and material manner.
We note it's a potential outcome which would also allow NanoXplore to lever up such provisioned capital in seeking to finance the expenditures relating to the company's strategic 5 year business development investment plan.
There was also no mention of the superior manner in which NanoXplore representatives are going about ensuring that each primary aspect of the NanoXplore five year strategic business development investment plan would in great part or wholly be capital financed by partners and customers necessarily first provisioning NanoXplore with awarded graphene offtakes purchase agreements and/or graphene products production offtake purchase agreements.
We would note that would be necessarily bonafide and bankable graphene production offtake purchase agreements and/or graphene enhanced products production offtake purchase agreements which can be levered and would in essence guarantee that all costs to expansion and forward going operating capital expenditures would ultimately be absorbed by would be customers requiring the graphene and/or the graphene enhanced products to be produced for such partner/custormer purposes.