ULTRAMAFICS ( what about the lower ultramafics ? )2015 pea resource included both upper and lower ultramafics.
In fact, they advertised the 846 million tonnes inferred.
They also included a higher grade core zone containing ( 0.64% Ni Eq or 2.4/g Pt Eq )
2015 and " new 2016 crews both said they'd work on pulling pgm's from the magnetite.
If they followed through with these press quotes, 2023 pfs would look entirely different.
Same goes for the measured exotics - these add considerable $$$$ to Eq values of pgm's.
Never followed through, even Stew mentioned in video he'd include the Rhodium values but
2023 pfs has no Rhodium - should be all 6 - 7 exotics ( Rubidium being the 7th ).
Wellgreen has higher iron ore grades than, CNC yet our pea's and current pfs never
alots for an iron credit even with the excess iron.
Between zone name changes boundary changes, cut offs, spot prices excuses,
upper lower ultramafic divisioninh and separating sulphides, gabbs to be tested later when
2015 already tested these and measured these ores and onward to even canceling out the
clinopyroxine due to extraction can't handle crystalines and even using course grind when
the silicates and crystalines host ultra fine metallics and require extra fine grind to liberate.
Deep drill holes not seen in pea's and pfs and 2023 shows a good time line of historical drills
2010 series missing and the oddity of not tabulating the total meters used to arrive at resource.
Anything else ? Pit Shift ?
Upper Grid
1st left side coordinate = 68 15 000
https://s21.q4cdn.com/491660439/files/doc_news/fareast-578375E-web.jpg 2015 pea pit began at = 68 15 300
leaving out - Johnson's 756m hole.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53520608537_e27368a5f4_c.jpg 2023 pit
Goes 200m more south than 2015's pit.
= pit shift If 200m more south = more dunite / peridotite
= allows one to angle pit wall to scale away and over top UG mine high grades.
This same image #2
has erased - sulphides, gabbs, clinopyroxines =
high grades + exotics Image # 2
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53655748970_73742cdb34_b.jpg Image # 1
Pit ( 1b ) is a narrow pit.
30.8 million tonnes ???
Walls south and north with center pit depth of, 1125m.
500m x 500m block grids. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53655748970_73742cdb34_b.jpg While this 2023 pit image # 2 with peridotite replacing 3 high grade ores
= shows a pit depth of over 800+m deep. 500m x 500m x 800m x 3 ore weight ( lower ultramafic ores are heavier
=
600,000,000 million tonnes lol Pits scale north west and appear to keep same elevation of height of mountains.
= surficial skim tonnage.
Which begs... lower ultramafics replaced by peridotites
Pits scale and skim going NW
Pit 1B only 30 million tonnes
vs
Pit 1B grid is 500m square or more with mineralization to 800m+ depth
= 600 million tonnes
What was 2023 pfs' waste ore tonnage ?
= 594 million tonnes ( near same as Pit 1B's 500m square x 800m depth
= 2023 included waste ore mining costs ( interesting )
Pit 1B
30.8 million tonnes vs 600 million tones
What are your thoughts " two busy to think straight "
Surely, you know what i think by now.
2023 PFS
Upper ultramafics with no high grade ?
reads that way
2015 PEA
measured the high grades and low.
2013 reassaying and new hole assaying. proves this.
Cheers...
Any " new news " Stew ?
Helluva long wait wouldn't you say ?
What would a new PFS look like ? - deduct 200 million shares common
- include 3 geologies ( high grades )
- include ug mine and mass ores below
- include all exotics
- pull 90% pgm's from magnetite ( spoken by 2015 crew and new 2016 crew
- high preasure acid leach 85%+ recoveries instead of 2023 25% metal payables
- include iron credit
- include Mg credit
- factor solution minerals ( nickel plat group )
- factor Te, Cr, Ti
= valuble project