RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:From CEO.ca Timeline slip ? Thoughts?They really can't discredit it as it's just one man's opinion. If it was worded as fact I.e. Matthew has confirmed with CRE management that the originally targeted timeline has now been extended into 2027, then management would have a case to refute that if such a discussion in fact never happened. But the way it's stated in the article is that it's opinion based on his expectation of what may happen given the challenges in the current market to secure financing etc. Take comfort in the fact that this opinion comes from an analyst, who belongs to the group of individual that is known to be most wrong right after meteriologists (just my personal opinion). Their "analysis" may as well be reading tea leaves.
Speedypete wrote: My point was why would cre repost the article rather than discredit it? Regardless. Here is a interesting comment quoted from x regarding the post
"Printing a false and misleading headline like this should be punishable by lawsuit. No company confirmation to support the clickbait statement. Bad journalism, poor credibility, weak effort at truth. A good example of failed duty to be objective and accurate."