RE:RE:SO: For example There will likely be higher ongoing costs - lease, utilities, other maintenance.
But if the are moving to a bigger place because they can use it to satisfy growing demand, you'd think there would be a net $ benefit.
Possibleidiot01 wrote: ramman1 wrote: If the cost of the 100% capacity increase in the ''GEM'' trap plant in England , and the ''new hires'' , is going to result in a charge of $ 500000 for next 6 Q's , JUST TELL ME:---------If you have 24 million in contracts behind pipe at 51% margin , and 40 % will be completed in the next 2 Q's , JUST TELL ME, I can plug the numbers into my calculations . --WHY HIDE THE INFO ???
Huh,the press release says " the recent move of our U.K. operations.."
It's possible they may be some ongoing expenses but I would think the vast majority of the plant expansion costs are history.
JMO