RE:RE:RE:Delay with powdersGet ready to look like you are on drugs or lacking common sense. Probably lacking business sense and experience because you are able to find this forum and type.
"The Company and Aubert & Duval mutually agreed to end their distribution agreement."
Not to argue about the important distinction between a "contract" and an "agreement" because the content could be important, there is an important distinction between "mutual agreement" and PYR being the one cancelling it. Do you know why A&D did so? Of course you don't. Not to make it equivalent, but I will remind you about making assumptions and how PYR "voluntarily" delisted from Nasdaq.
"The next day we are dealing with the customers directly." I have this suspicion that you are trying to make is sound like they got out of the agreement and then the next day they inked a sale with this customer. This is highly unlikey, and therefore we don't know when the agreement with A&D was ended.
Which part of you only assuming the best scenario didn't you get? What about the scenario where A&D maybe didn't get a positive reaction or expression of interest from its client base and let PYR go on its own? If A&D got a positive reaction and could sell decent amounts to its clients, why would they forgo that revenue stream? i don't know the reason for mutually agreeing to end the agreement, but tell me how this would make sense from A&D's perspective?
Holdrrrr wrote: Mostlyserious wrote: Very good news based on YOUR assumption that has only a positive slant.
And the other side of the spectrum as to A&D letting go of the agreement is.....you fill the blanks.
Making assumptions is not safe for investment decisions, and at times, it is not safe to put a positive slant on companies' forward looking statements.
Are you on drugs? Or just lacking any common sense?
Py cancelled the contract with Albert & Duval was for the powders, the next day we are dealing with the customers directly.
Give your head a shake.