Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mako Mining Corp V.MKO

Alternate Symbol(s):  MAKOF

Mako Mining Corp. is a Canada-based gold mining, development and exploration company. The Company holds 100% of four mineral concessions in Nueva Segovia, Nicaragua for a total land package of approximately 18,817 hectares. The San Albino gold deposit, located within the San Albino-Murra Property mine is in Nueva Segovia, Nicaragua. Its San Albino gold project is an open pit development project located in Nueva Segovia, Nicaragua, approximately 173 kilometers north of Managua and accessible through a paved highway. Its Las Conchitas area is located approximately 2.5 kilometers south of its high-grade San Albino Gold Deposit and is situated near the southern end of the Corona de Oro Gold Belt. Its subsidiaries include Gold Belt, S.A., Marlin Gold Mining Ltd., Marlin Gold Trading Inc., Nicoz Resources, S.A. and Oro Gold de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.


TSXV:MKO - Post by User

Comment by AkibaLeismanon May 03, 2024 2:59pm
132 Views
Post# 36022271

RE:Liquidity

RE:Liquidity

It's a question of magnitude.  You're right that the Gxs acquisition would incrementally increase the float, and l suppose the liquidity as well.   The NCIB would decrease the float.  

If you issue 13.2m shares to acquire another asset and buy back 1.2m, the net effect on liquidity is still positive. 

wexford moving from 46.5 to 47% (or frankly even 50.1%) doesn't practically change anything about their control. 

Share based M&A chums the waters.  The shark was there to deal with that, and we had many millions of $ to be able to buy these shares using cash flow).  The NCIB wasn't about maintaining a certain level of float. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>