RE:RE:Holdrrrr questionMostlyserious wrote: He said he averaged at 40 and not that his average was 40. He could have recovered most of his losses if he had not bought much or anything much above these levels.
i bought quite a bit above $3 and beyond. I would have to had averaged down quite a bit at the lowest points to start meaningfully recovering my losses and that simply would be foolish to do on a company that is operating with a significant working deficit and raises money through loans from insiders.
Going back to that interview, you see Peter, you have not changed people's lives only for better.
filoux004 wrote: So you are telling us your ACB is .40...really?? you bought shares in 2016 under .30cents??? I guess you are a very patient investor but I will politely express doubts on yr claim. Glta fins out shorthly
That's entirely your own decision to make mostlyserious. But seeing as you side with the fudsters, and absolutely refuse to see any news about pyr as a positive, I'm afraid you have tunnel vision.
The past is past, companies can in fact change, things change. All companies have growing pains. But if you are only able to see through one lens, you will miss opportunity.
Unlike Tamarackflop who outright orders people to sell, I will not suggest trading advice to anyone, because your money is none of my business.
Good luck