Reliq Health Technologies Inc V.RHT.H

RE:RE:Proposed changes to RPM billing rules

[Qwerty54321]

Horses for courses. My father would be great at this because he does everything the doc says. My mother not so much. Somebody who has had a heart attack will be keen to monitor for the next, that keenness might fade over time. Somebody just high risk might not be so keen.

Step one would be get yourself a large population to play with (they seem to have that). Step two identify the best revenue generating "types" of patients. It's probably always been crazy to think the aimed for high adherence numbers could be achieved over a whole population.

It was probably very low single digit % of their total pop under contract that was generating revenue a year ago. Let's hope the pop is now bigger and maybe they've moved to mid-single digit %. I'm expecting small steps.

lscfa wrote: I can see a scenario where clinicians will say it's too damn much time and effort to get 16 patient readings per month and will settle for all their patients just hitting 2 to 15 readings even if it means a lower reimbursement rate. 100% reimbursement at a reduced rate might be > partial reimbursement at a higher rate.