RE:AnybodyMrPeters wrote: Anybody have any input on this NR? I’m not savvy enough to fully understand why the extension. To me it could be scary?
If I understand it right, a main reasn to extend the date is to give IO more time to decide if they even want the shares at 1.86, or not. Is this correct? gl
It's really scary. How much worse could it be? Extending the term of the agreement and extending access to additional freehold lands across the Clearwater Area. I'm not savvy enough either to know for sure. Perhaps some of our fellow posters could help us out?