Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia, which is host to the Goldstorm Deposit, a large gold-copper porphyry system, as well as several other mineralized zones. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,913 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Comment by rockport1on May 14, 2024 8:44pm
181 Views
Post# 36040077

RE:RE:FROM SEA'S Q1 REPORT RE: MTT

RE:RE:FROM SEA'S Q1 REPORT RE: MTTCSK, I disagree with your statement.  You need to read Seabridge's report with a lawyer's eye. It does state that the LoO is still valid, subsequent to the Tudor challenge. However, it does not state that KSM has construction permits for the MTT on Tudor lands.  This is what they state:

KSMCo "holds a number of permits required for the MTT including a Mines Act permit M-245 (“M-245”) covering a portion of the MTT construction;"

The highlight is mine. They have some permits but not all, only a portion covering the MTT.  This is the point of the dispute.  They must still satisify the terms of the LoO to receive the final construction permits for the entire length of the MTT.  In other words, they must still satisfy the rights holders, namely Tudor, Teuton and AMK.

cskhurasu wrote: Obviously, SEA's latest disclosure indicates they think they do not need the permission of TUD to construct the MTT and TUD cannot interfere with its construction on TUD claims.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>