RE:RE:Some Questions & And Answer Or Twolire1,
Question: Where in hades are the $80 Million worth of Government of Canada funded grants which are to be provided for NanoXplore?
ANSWER: Likely only to be disbursed as each business aspect of the NanoXplore five year strategic business development investment plan is necessarily firmed up by prerequisite long term commitments for NanoXplore being provided by necessarily offtake purchase agreement issuing and concurrent capital provisioning agreement customers/partners.
The Canadian Federal Government would be paying as NanoXplore goes, so to speak, and reimbursing NanoXplore for expenditures incurred along the prerequisite development of each business aspect relating to NanoXplore's five year strategic business development investment plan.
QUESTION: Where are the offtake agreements making possible the provisioning of a "Go" Final Investment Decision or "Go FID", with respect to the thereafter immediate commencement of that 16,000 tpa graphene manufacturing and graphene enhanced battery anode component materials process manufacturing facility?
Answer: Presently still negotiating potential customers are aurging NanoXplore officers and directors to expedite the building out of the proposed graphene enhanced battery anode component materials and "SiGTM" anode additive material manufacturing component to the five year strategic business development investment plan.
Apparently, NanoXplore management let it be clearly known that there is a great need on the part of such presently still negotiating with NanoXplore battery cells manufacturers to as quickly as humanly possible purchase enough of NanoXplore's proprietary "BAM" solutions, so as to allow the specific automotive manufacturer customers of such battery cells manufacturers to regain eligibility for U.S. "IRA" supported battery-electric powered vehicles customers purchase subsidies.
Hmm? Which U.S. situated automotive manufacturer recently lost and/or stands to lose eligibility under the U.S. "IRA" relating regulations for said purchase subsidies and which battery cells manufacturers and partners are known to be supplying such very needy U.S. situated automotive manufacturers?
The answer to such a question would provide you with a good idea of which battery cells manufacturer (s) are urging NanoXplore to build out the company's proposed capacity manufacturing of it's various proprietary "BAM" solutions.
QUESTION: Where in hades is that NanoXplore management long promoted and seemingly nowhere near realized as duly consummated "commercial agreement" amongst NanoXplore and that globally well recognized chemicals company?
It's been closer to a fiscal year since Mr. Soroush Nazarpour touted, during that quarterly financials conderence call, the negotiating of said agreement with a certain company which I had long ago (circa 2019) referred to as being "The Industrial Titan".
ANSWER: Apparently, said prospective commercial agreement intering into and globally recognized chemical corporation, the very company which I long ago dubbed "The Industrial Titan", is not yet prepared to fully and finally consummate with NanoXplore such a long touted and yet simply not yet materialized "commercial agreement".
Although, I will once again point out the following information.
It's widely known that NanoXplore proprietary "Graphene BlackTM" is already certified with Ford Motor Company and it's wholly owned subsidiary entity for use as a fist conductive filler comprising highly conductive electrical pathways within plastic material.
See "Running Board Activated Vehicle Powered Closure Member Systems"
Applicant: Ford Global Technologies, LLC, Dearborn MI, (US).
United States Patent, Salter et al.
Patent No.: 11,781,369 B2
Date of Patent: October 10, 2023
Two Part Question: Is everything to do with that additional 8,000 tpa capacity production of NanoXplore's proprietary "dry process" manufactured graphene at that proposed 16,000 tpa capacity facility (8,00 tpa graphene and 8,000 tpa graphene enhanced battery materials) dependent on "the industrial titan" chemical company actually first entering into that long touted and not as yet finally consummated "commercial agreement" with NanoXplore; and if so, is that as yet unnamed "industrial titan" the number two largest chemicals company, America's Dow Inc., or would it be BASF, the world's largest chemicals company?
ANSWER: In my opinion yes, as there is a majority of the proposed as "dry process" manufactured and relatively "less refined" graphene material product which is apparently reserved and slated to be supplied to a very large scale industrial graphene enhanced products manufacturer and NanoXplore commercial agreement entering into customer. Again, that would be the majority of any "dry process" manufactured and relatively "less refined" graphene material is going to be required by just one NanoXplore commercial agreement entering into customer; and the better portion of the $80 Million in expected Government of Canada capital grants are likely going to be disbursed when such a prospective customer fully and finally consummates the commercial agreement in question with NanoXplore.
Question: Is it widely known that NanoXplore proprietary "Graphene BlackTM" is already certified with Ford Motor Company and it's wholly owned subsidiary entity for use as a first conductive filler comprising highly conductive electrical pathways within prorprietary plastic material.
ANSWER: Simply refer to the previously provided Ford Global Technologies, LLC (US) relating patent while finding out. I had previously spoken at some length to this particular development.
Do you know just how many other certified for use graphene enhanced products Ford Motor company is gong to be employing NanoXplore's proprietary graphene in the proprietary manufacturing of?
What's more, would Ford Global Technologies, LLC (US) representatives be thinking about purchasing and folding a particular portion of NanoXplore (e.g. XG Sciences Inc) into Ford Motor Company operations in due course?