RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Regarding Q3/2024 Financials & The GRA.T Share PriceDrJayser,
You stated "This was the statement Q.. battery material is the first vertical to go hockey stick! I cant believe no one sees this....Herd mentality is alive and well! hope the idiot , sold all of his 10,000 shares . what a clown!!!"
May I ask whom exactly you are suggesting would be "the idiot" and "a clown"?
For those of us who are definitely not idiots nor clowns, I will have you most specifically note the fact being that an established "hockey stick" shaped growth profile for any given NanoXplore business vertical, e.g. battery materials, would have already resulted in immensely greater adjusted EBITDA profitability and importantly, a NanoXplore share price which doesn't have any problem actually attaining buoyancy and sustaining buoyancy well above a measly CAD$3.00.
Who the flock of seagulls are you kidding Drjayser?
I hold what amounts to being more than 25% of my net worth as having been invested here with NanoXplore.
I'll bet you the equivalent of another 25% of my net worth that niether you nor Mr. Soroush Nazarpour or any other company insideror GRA.T shareholder maintains more than 25% of their net worth as being invested here with NanoXplore.
Should the greater equities investing market participants be made to begin viewing NanoXplore as more than what presently appears to some as being "a wet sockpuppet",lol, perhaps then I would begin to pay more attention.
Suffice to say "the opportunity costs" resulting from my choosing to keep holding my current GRA.T equity ownership position have been immense.
That hockey stick shaped growth may very well present in future; perhaps five years from now, which would undoubtedly result in more "opportunity costs" being borne during the meanwhile.