RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New InterviewI think you are wrong. Think what happens after the payback period on the capital investment.
If the bottom line is the same for HPQ under both scenarios is the same the same would hold true for PYR. PYR is the one that held the rights to these two scenarios. PYR should pick an option that is more favourable to them. If they are the same, who cares. Now Bernard and Peter have to both agree on decisions. Who do you think will be more persuasive. Wonder if the decision to exercise that right is made now on purpose before potential negotiations with any external party. We'll see but since PYR held the choice, what Bernard thought was inconsequential. As he said, he was surprised, meaning did not expect it.
it is what it is. Both companies need to start selling stuff to start generating cashflow.