RE:RE:RE:Paul's Explanation It's somewhat laughable
Asdfghjk to ask how long Singh has been with us and then suggest that by addressing Paul’s actions, we’re not giving Singh a fair chance. The irony here is that by raising concerns about Paul’s inflated sense of self-importance, abilities, and expectation of favorable treatment, we’re actually trying to ensure that Singh and others won’t receive special treatment or privileges without earning them.
Disregarding other people's opinions that don’t conform to your bias and calling it 'negativity' is misleading. From my perspective, this is not about negativity; it’s about accountability and protecting the interests of retail investors.
Moreover, while Paul isn’t the entire company, his decisions have a significant impact, so discussing them is important.
Finally, the comment about investing in a junior miner seems a bit off.