JT request rejected in libel caseBack in April in C 29407-2016, JT requested that a psychologist shrink JL to better ascertain his level of psychological damage. He also requested that the Court consider Unda's "dual testimony" from C 1912-2001.
The Court resolved: Given that the measures to better resolve are optional for the Court and not mandatory, and also considering that the parties had the full evidentiary period to ascertain the evidence that they believe could substantiate their claim, the request is denied.