RE:RE:Key to the city.Lawisfun, you state that Pulead “walked away from Nano One and their process technology.” Or did Nano One walk away from Pulead because Nano wanted to disengage from Chinese companies that would want that same, competing, technology? As an example see the history of American Superconductor and how that company was almost destroyed by the appropriation of their cutting edge technology by their Chinese “partner”. Maybe it was Nano that did the “walking away.”
You also said to look at who’s number one. The list doesn’t indicate which one is number one, only that Pulead is listed first in a bulleted list. Johnson Matthey is listed and they don’t even do CAM after they sold their Candiac facility to Nano. I would question the age and quality of the information and what was the criteria used to create the list.
Once again you’re trying to add 1 + 1 to get 3.