Stolen from poster on CEO board It should be clarified that this is distinct from the Zn-Pb-Ag-Ge deposit which is >10Mt so far and in that case, copper is not economic. Rather, it is found in trace amounts and if you, like I have been, log every hole drilled on the deposit so far, will see a small but sustained increase in copper to the NE. The company has stated on multiple occasions that geologically this non-economic indicator is indicative that we're nearing the middle of the deposit. Which, given the high sustained grade and tonnage we're already at bodes extremely well and provides insight into why they are reluctant to do a 43-101 and establish a tonnage which doesn't provide a glimpse of what we (tacitly understand we) actually have. Private companies that have analyzed the data understand this fact though."
Smart guy knows better than you bears