RE:The relationship between the amigos…Captain, my opinion is that Larry is here strictly to undermine the Treaty Creek project. More recently he has been attempting to drive a wedge between the three parties. This is a typical strategy to generate dissent, and is often used in politics. Again, the goal is to undermine the credibility of the entire project. Do not fall for this.
Regarding the management relationship between the parties. It is fine. Yes, there is some history between AMK/TUO, but it is now amicable and functional. Besides, Tudor is the driver of the project and they make the decisions. Note, that TUO and Dino were the ones that lobbied Walter to bring in Ken Konkin.
The only reason I brought up the past lawsuits is because I think folks need to be careful what they say on the bullboards. You cannot make blatant lies and defamtory comments with impunity. I am tired of some of the garbage spewed by naysayers that perhaps may cross a line. If anyone wants to know just how much the bullboards, internet providers, etc cooperate with legal authorities, I suggest they carefully read the American Creek press release from Dec 14, 2012. The amount of detail they provide is quite enlightening.
CaptainE wrote: Might not be so amigo-like. In a call with Tud IR a few months back one of my questions was whether the relationship between the three was good or not. There was a pause and although I don't recall the exact words it led me to believe the relationship had some strain or was not ideal. I muted this Larry fool but I can see he's pretty actively spewing his vomit here. Is there any reason that Tuo/Dino would benefit by having bashers attend the Tud and Amk boards while continually pumping Tuo? It seems pretty dumb to me but the more I read and hear of the foul past and a defamation lawsuit I am considering this is a possibility. Thoughts from the long timers here?