RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:If/When There Is An Early Buyout,Rockport,
Im not a promoter. More imprtantly, Dino is not the kind of guy to waste money on a promoter! TUO does not need a promoter. Why? Cuz facts speak for themselves! FREE CARRY TO PRODUCTION so head and shoulders above TUD, and in terms of AMK, even at the new pump price of 17 cents, is still still WAAAAAYYYYYY better....no comparison:
Comparison below is quite straight forward. TUO market cap currently $5 million less than AMK - that alone is reason to choose it over AMK plus if/when the Cunningshennanigan deal goes away, AMK gonna get hammered. BUT TUO also OWNS: 1) THE NSR ON TC! 2) $10 million stock portfolio (incl 3 or 4 million TUD) 3) a few dozen other properties/nsrs You are getting the 20% of TC at a discount to AMK PLUS you are GETTING 1 TO 3 FOR FREE!!!! I would argue the NSR could easily fore $40 million.........................$140 million if TC is proven viable! | | AMK | | TUO |
O/S | | 457,025,355 | | 57,346,881 |
Price | | 0.17 | | 1.26 |
| | | | |
Market Cap | 77,694,310 | | 72,257,070 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
TUO Stock Portfolio | | | 10,000,000 |
| | | | |
TUO Property portfolion ex TC NSR distressed sale | | 5,000,000 |
| | | | |
TUO TC NSR distressed sale | | | 25000000 |
| | | | |
TUO Mkt Cap net of distressed sale of assets | | 32,257,070 |
| | | | |
So TUO is bening valued at less than HALF of AMK for the same 20% of TC |
| | | | |
And remember, the non TC assets, especailly NSR on TC, are | |
worth way more than the numbers I put down |
rockport1 wrote: To be clear. He is not a paid promoter of TUO. His purpose here is to create dissent between the Treaty Creek parties: divide and conquer, if you will. It is an attempt to discredit the entire project.
Tudor is driving the boat, but Tudor, American Creek and Teuton are working together on this project.
Signman wrote: It's clear based on ALL your posts you work for TUO as a paid promoter / basher Larry. OP should be aware of this.