RE:RE:RE:RE:I have to wonder sometimes,Occam takes in the simpliest solution, not necessarily the correctly thought out process.
I've heard you reference this on numerous occassions and feel you take a more heuristic reasoning to decision making.
Simply minds, simply ideas.
Sven and yourself try to use philosophical distractions in order to justify your lack of factual responses to the pertinent facts being presented.
I personally have had to enbrace a methodology in my career that observes all potential aspects of a problem (or project) and ensure the issue can either be resolved or removed from the potential of harming the project's schedule or budget.
Solve the issues before they become an issue.
When I ask a question and that question is properly responded too (not just attacking the person) then the issue is resolved and filed away.
Unfortunately with this group the vast majority questions are merely piling up, not coming to any type of resolution. In my opinion the "projects" are not on time or on budget and therefore are currently presenting significant risk profiles.
Plain and simple.
I don't personally agree with the vast majority of "blah, blah, blah" presented by Tyler Joe but take them with a grain salt and file them under "it's irrelevant" and move on.
Merely attacking somebody asking questions (that you can't seem to answer) as far as I'm concerned screams out that you either are hiding the truth or honestly have no clue.
Plain and simple.