Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Nevada Copper Corp NEVDQ

Nevada Copper Corp is a Canada-based mining company. The Company is engaged in the development, operation, and exploration of its copper project (the Project) at its Pumpkin Hollow Property (the Property) in Western Nevada, United States of America. Its two fully permitted projects include the high-grade Underground Mine and processing facility, which is undergoing a restart of operations, and a large-scale open pit PFS stage project. The Property is located in northwestern Nevada and consists of approximately 24,300 acres of contiguous mineral rights including approximately 10,800 acres of owned private land and leased patented claims. Pumpkin Hollow is located approximately 8 miles southeast of the small town of Yerington, Nevada in Lyon County, one- and one-half hours drive southeast of Reno. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is Nevada Copper, Inc.


GREY:NEVDQ - Post by User

Comment by Dragonflyinveston Jun 16, 2024 10:49am
107 Views
Post# 36091068

RE:Bill introduced to convey BLM land to Yerington -

RE:Bill introduced to convey BLM land to Yerington - When congress delayed the land bill, and the price of copper cratered, Pala thought they could scrape by building a "satellite” mine to the OP for a couple years until the price of copper recovered and they could sell the mine then.

The UG mine was a “compromise” and an alternation of the original business plan that sold many early investors on PH, a second best guess that was really not best at all.  When we learned that they were litigating with their first shaft contractor, that should have been an indication they simply weren’t up to the task.  I never dug into the issues of that lawsuit, but knew there are too many other copper miners available to get involved with a management with such internal problems.

So, when some wonder if PH has “a red flag that this property is not likely to be profitable under new management.” We can only speak of this second-best compromise that Pala had neither the financial resources nor mining experience to properly manage.  I do not see the problems that Nevada Copper has experienced with the UG as indicative of that which a major building the OP would encounter.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>