RE:So LarryIf TUD was behind the shell, and theyre not imho, they would need to disclose that for a number of reasons! The usual plain true and timely disclosure requirement would apply. In this case, if it were a an actual bid, and its not, additional disclosure would kick in as well!
To hold back this info would be a grave violation of securities lwas.
KK would never do that!!!!
But dont worry. There is no bid. Just the Cunningham group makin noise. The same group whose parent co is a pink sheet listed $2.5M market cap company who has failed to file financials for years.............has close to $0 cash!
fordster wrote: Why is that idea slanderous? Common sense dictates Tudor would like to own as much of TC as possible. And if "insiders" are in control of AMK, there's no fraud because the rest of us don't mater at that point...and a shell company is a perfect vehicle. It would take a few more steps to complete it. In the mean time, AMK is bought out at a cheap/fair price without anyone creating a frenzy on the SP...you act as if it's never been done before.