ACTIVE MATERIAL ( NOU ) Mason aside of GEM.
17% - 61% SiO2
What if it's not all silicon dioxide ?
What if there's significant carbon merged into the silicon crystal ?
Remember, silica quarta doen't react to acids nor melts at 1000 degree lab firings.
1000 degrees measures carbon, sulphur, oxygen burnt off.
Carbon sealed with in silica crystals would remain intact.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53787450498_62fd3aba51_c.jpg
Why did NOU recieve permitting with under 4% graphite grades ?
Could it be... active material has to do more so with - carbon crystals ( moissanite ) ?
US wanted concentrates.
Concentrates would also include other non graphitics.
Carbon sealed in, Silica Quartz = Smokey Quartz = Moissanite = Dismond
= Silicon Carbide = Chips = Wafers = Electrodes = Silicon Anodes ( with active carbon )
= superb conductivitu.
Could an under 4% graphite deposit be more valuable ?
Valuble due to it's ---------> carbon crystal moissanite / silica carbide ?
I'm beginning to think.... maybe so.
Smokey Quartz Crystal with in GEM's drill core.
Top Left.
Sad part ?
GEM's Geo culled ( low grade cores ) by way of, VISUAL GRADING.
What would have the grestest amount of, crystal ?
= Low grade graphite ores.
Foot and Hang wall contacts where silica meets graphitics
= could be valuble ore based on, carbon merging with crystals !!!
= Moissanite Crystals ( silica Carbide ) = Silica with active material = carbon.
Here's a photo of, NOU's cores.
Full of quartz crystals and minimal carbon graphite.
= Lower grade ores containing more crystals with carbon.
= US switching to silica ?
= what type ? lol
I'm seeing smokey quarts with, mica schist.
Mica Schist form of valuble perovskite ( Musk Solar Panels )
What is in, GEM's discarded cores ?
6% grade and unde not factored ?
While NOU factors 3.5% grades and 1.78% cutoff ?
OMG.