RE:RE:RE:Still waiting for DearlolI find that somewhat of an interesting response considering you received a private email correspondance from Jeff, which contained a letter from Carissa Beecham (Greenbriar's Senior legal cousel for the Water case) in which I assume it probably had this statement on top
"Urgent - Confidential Attorney Client Workproduct".
I've received the same, in the past, but have never published anything publicly from such a document.
You built a false narrative in which you stated,
"...it is much more profitable that one hires an independent water lawyer from a major law firm in California specializing in nothing but CEQA and EIR water law in the state."
I think you can appreciate the fact that being Greenbriar's lawyer does not make them independent of the case.
"I have legal and moral obligation to not disclose confidential information"
And yet you did.
I appreciate the fact you felt you were trying to provide shareholders with important information but think about the fact the CEO hasn't released any of this information. Unfortunately you were being used and are receiving the brunt of the fallout.
It's not your fault.
Disclosing that extremely relevant information to a select few shareholders is definitely questionable to say the least.
Insider information refers to non-public facts about a publicly-traded company which could provide an advantage to investors. - Investopedia