RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Volume Precedes price !! Nonverbatim??? is that like a nonbinding nonbid? You say "The termination clause period is for nine months from the date of the LOI, not a year as you incorrectly stated, again."
But you are WRONG. It is 9 months from the termination date! I have said this many times. That gives cunninghams 11+ months...........and i'll bet they extend the LOI which will give them more time!
From the NR Mr. NonVerbatim: "If a termination fee event occurs, and within nine calendar months of such termination..."
Go back to Verbatim school!!!
"
MrVerbatim9800 wrote: Hey Larry..... Since Cunningham mining is a private company and the only company listed in the LOI to purchase AMK at .43. How would you know what their financial situation is or, who their third party investor's are (if they needed one)? You have no idea and, that's a fact.
LOI's aren't essentially a buyout offer? As you stated here, they are. "the potential of other properties, assuming it does not rise too far in tandem with the AMK buyout level"
AMK is not locked out of negotiating and entertaining other offers if they are unsolicited by AMK. Pretty standard.
A break fee if AMK accepts an offer from another entity? That would be factored into the purchase, so who cares. Pretty standard. The termination clause period is for nine months from the date of the LOI, not a year as you incorrectly stated, again.
This can absolutely be a yes or no situation. Once due dilgence is completed the decision can be made in an instant with a vote completed by the shareholder majority (AMK and Sprot). You cerntainly wouldn't hold any weight in a decision since, by your own excited admission, you don't own any shares of AMK
People, this is a tactic by Larry and other Larry's like him....... First, they try to beat you down with unrelenting, repetative and manipulative spins of the truth or complete lies (gaslighting). Then (this is where Larry is at now) they give you the impression that they are empathizing with you and agreeing with you just a little bit (while still providing manipulative statements based on non-fact) to gain your trust and to undermine those who are undermining his attempts at manipulating the shareholders, potential shareholders and the price of a stock (spreading fear and confusion while still gaslighting you).
Larry, give it a break, kiddo....... Your tactics are obvious and still week...
V