RE:RE:Cheap premium under 7%marketsense wrote: In total agreement. Been saying the same thing. For a fund that is diversified and has
active managers, it has proved to be a reliable payer and been able to keep on top
of its NAV. That should justify having a decent premium IMO and should keep investors
more in than out.
Look at the 7% premium as cream to be skimmed off by the shorters. When the market is someday on its way down, they short this and make 7% in 2 weeks. After what happened last summer, I'll never again hold splits at more than 3% premium.