RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Details DetailsYes the numbers I grabbed are from the 2022 technical report....
The numbers you are quoting are only for Kerr/iron cap...the Mitchell/sulphurets numbers are lower and dilute through grades....
Sasha11 wrote: To address the backroom boiler room boys from earlier posts today, why isn’t Tudor putting out this data and in more detail? A February 5 2024 NR states KSM average copper grade is 0.27 to 0.41 and carries most of the gold, although PEA shows barely makes saleable copper conc grade and with relatively poor recovery. Tudor stated resource grade is 0.18% Cu (don’t cherry pick higher grade zones unless that is going to be your resource). Now whose lying Jetstream? If Albion process is being used by Tudor that means they cant produce a saleable conc and need a much more expensive process, along with a higher feed grade to support it. Cyanidation does not take time to perfect, its been perfected for over a 100 years. It does take time to permit if at all, and it doesn’t like copper in the feed. 94% recovery with expensive pretreatment does not make a project. Give us all the data before saying you have one of the worlds biggest gold deposits.
I’m not saying KSM is a great project; sure its big, but marginal that’s why no takers yet. Still they are decades ahead of Tudor, more economic, and way more honest.